Which is NOT a concept explained in Dorothy Johnson's Behavioral Systems Model?

Which is NOT a concept explained in Dorothy Johnson's Behavioral Systems Model?

• A. Affiliation
• B. Dependency
• C. Achievement
• D. Energy fields

Answer: (D)

In this model, behavior is viewed as organized into subsystems that guide how a person respond to and maintain balance within their environment. The subsystems outlined by Dorothy Johnson include affiliative (attachment/social bonding), dependency, ingestive (eating/drinking), eliminative (excretion), sexual, aggressive (defense/withdrawal), and achievement (mastery/goal-directed activity). These subsystems describe the patterned ways people behave to meet needs and stay stable. The term energy fields, however, comes from Martha Rogers, who sees a person as an energy field interacting with another energy field. Energy fields are not part of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, so that concept isn’t explained by her framework. Therefore, the option describing energy fields is the one that does not fit Johnson’s model. The other concepts listed are indeed parts of Johnson’s subsystems.

In this model, behavior is viewed as organized into subsystems that guide how a person respond to and maintain balance within their environment. The subsystems outlined by Dorothy Johnson include affiliative (attachment/social bonding), dependency, ingestive (eating/drinking), eliminative (excretion), sexual, aggressive (defense/withdrawal), and achievement (mastery/goal-directed activity). These subsystems describe the patterned ways people behave to meet needs and stay stable.

The term energy fields, however, comes from Martha Rogers, who sees a person as an energy field interacting with another energy field. Energy fields are not part of Johnson’s Behavioral System Model, so that concept isn’t explained by her framework. Therefore, the option describing energy fields is the one that does not fit Johnson’s model. The other concepts listed are indeed parts of Johnson’s subsystems.